Füllungstherapie im Milchgebiss

Literatur

• 1 Pieper K. Epidemiologische Begleituntersuchung zur Gruppenprophylaxe 2004. Bonn; Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Jugendzahnpflege e.V. 2005
• 2 Robke F J, Buitkamp M. Häufigkeit der Nuckelflaschenkaries bei Vorschulkindern in einer westdeutschen Großstadt.  Oral Prophyl. 2002;  24 59-65
• 3 Panetta F, Dall'Oca S, Nofroni I. et al . Early childhood caries. Oral health survey in kindergartens of the 19th district in Rome.  Minerva Stomatol. 2004;  53 669-678
• 4 Berkowitz R J. Causes, treatment and prevention of early childhood caries: a microbiologic perspective.  J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;  69 304-307
• 5 Silverstone L M. The histopathology of early approximal caries in the enamel of primary teeth.  ASDC J Dent Child. 1970;  37 201-210
• 6 Stößer L. Fluorid zur Prävention der Milchzahnkaries.  Oralprophylaxe Kinderzahnheilkd. 2008;  30 20-29
• 7 Nor J E, Feigal R J, Dennison J B. et al . Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface in primary and permanent teeth.  Pediatr Dent. 1997;  19 246-252
• 8 Duggal M S, Nooh A, High A. Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future.  Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;  3 111-114
• 9 Kidd E A. How “clean” must a cavity be before restoration?.  Caries Res. 2004;  38 305-313
• 10 Roulet J F. Ein klinischer Vergleich 3-er Komposits mit Amalgam im Seitenzahnbereich.  Zahnärtl Welt. 1977;  86 1055-1062
• 11 Ripa L W, Gwinnett A J, Buonocore M G. The “prismless” outer layer of deciduous and permanent enamel.  Arch Oral Biol. 1966;  11 41-48
• 12 Kodaka T, Nakajima F, Higashi S. Structure of the so-called “prismless” enamel in human deciduous teeth.  Caries Res. 1989;  23 290-296
• 13 Gwinnett A J, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of etching time and acid concentration on resin shear bond strength to primary tooth enamel.  Am J Dent. 1992;  5 237-239
• 14 Garcia-Godoy F, Gwinnett A J. Effect of etching times and mechanical pretreatment on the enamel of primary teeth: an SEM study.  Am J Dent. 1991;  4 115-118
• 15 Simonsen R J. The clinical effectiveness of a colored pit and fissure sealant at 36 months.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1981;  102 323-327
• 16 Stößer L, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Hickel R. et al . Fissurenversiegelung.  Oralprophlaxe Kinderzahnheilkd. 2006;  28 141-143
• 17 Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N. et al . Die Verbindung von Adhäsivsystemen verschiedener Generationen mit Schmelz und Dentin der ersten und zweiten Dentition.  Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 1997;  52 795-799
• 18 Andersson-Wenckert I E, Folkesson U H, van Dijken J W. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.  Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;  55 255-260
• 19 Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C. et al . Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.  Oper Dent. 2000;  25 259-264
• 20 Sardella T N, de Castro F L, Sanabe M E. et al . Shortening of primary dentin etching time and its implication on bond strength.  J Dent. 2005;  33 355-362
• 21 Hugo B. Oszillierende Verfahren in der Präparationstechnik (Teil I).  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1999;  109 140-153
• 22 Atkins Jr C O, Rubenstein L, Avent M. Preliminary clinical evaluation of dentinal and enamel bonding in primary anterior teeth.  J Pedod. 1986;  10 239-246
• 23 van Waes H JM, Stöckli P W. Kinderzahnmedizin. 1. Aufl. Stuttgart; Thieme 2001
• 24 Xie D, Brantley W A, Culbertson B M. et al . Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements.  Dent Mater. 2000;  16 129-138
• 25 Kamann W K. Kofferdam – Wandel von Indikation und Technik.  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2001;  108 771-777
• 26 Ben-Zur E. Konservierende Versorgung im Milchgebiß. Hotz PR Zahnmedizin bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Stuttgart; Thieme 1976
• 27 Dietrich T, Losche A C, Losche G M. et al . Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine [published erratum appears in: J Dent 1999; 27(6): 463 – 464].  J Dent. 1999;  27 119-128
• 28 Dörfer C. Der Approximalraum.  Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 2001;  52 137-151
• 29 van Waes H. Füllungstherapie kariöser Milchmolaren: Materialien und Methoden.  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1993;  103 947-957
• 30 Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies E H. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth.  Dent Mater. 1992;  8 74-78
• 31 Fagan T R, Crall J J, Jensen M E. et al . A comparison of two dentin bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.  Pediatr Dent. 1986;  8 144-146
• 32 Holan G, Chosack A, Casamassimo P S. et al . Marginal leakage of impregnated class 2 composites in primary molars: an in vivo study.  Oper Dent. 1992;  17 122-128
• 33 Duggal M S, Nooh A, High A. Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future.  Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;  3 111-114
• 34 Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.  J Adhes Dent. 2001;  3 45-64
• 35 Wasson E A, Nicholson J W. Studies on the setting chemistry of glass-ionomer cements.  Clinical Materials. 1991;  7 289-293
• 36 Wasson E A, Nicholson J W. New aspects of the setting of glass-ionomer cements.  J Dent Res. 1993;  72 481-483
• 37 Dowling A H, Fleming G J. Are encapsulated anterior glass-ionomer restoratives better than their hand-mixed equivalents?.  J Dent. 2009;  37 133-140
• 38 Dowling A H, Fleming G J. Is encapsulation of posterior glass-ionomer restoratives the solution to clinically induced variability introduced on mixing?.  Dent Mater. 2008;  24 957-966
• 39 Burke F J, Fleming G J, Owen F J. et al . Materials for restoration of primary teeth: 2. glass ionomer derivatives and compomers.  Dent Update. 2002;  29 10-17
• 40 Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of a condensable metal-reinforced glass ionomer cement in primary molars.  Br Dent J. 2001;  190 317-321
• 41 Qvist V, Manscher E, Teglers P T. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.  J Dent. 2004;  32 285-294
• 42 Burrow M F, Bokas J, Tanumiharja M. et al . Microtensile bond strengths to caries-affected dentine treated with Carisolv.  Aust Dent J. 2003;  48 110-114
• 43 Mount G J, Patel C, Makinson O F. Resin modified glass-ionomers: strength, cure depth and translucency.  Aust Dent J. 2002;  47 339-343
• 44 Burke F M, Hamlin P D, Lynch E J. Depth of cure of light-cured glass-ionomer cements.  Quintessence Int. 1990;  21 977-981
• 45 Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A. et al . Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.  Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;  112 188-196
• 46 Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou-Koubia E. et al . Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around fluoride releasing materials.  J Oral Rehabil. 2003;  30 1216-1222
• 47 Donly K J, Segura A, Kanellis M. et al . Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;  130 1459-1466
• 48 Ernst C P, Weckmüller C, Willershausen B. Milchzahnaufbauten mit Kompomeren.  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1995;  105 664-671
• 49 Garcia-Godoy F. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.  Dent Clin North Am. 2000;  44 541-570
• 50 Tran L A, Messer L B. Clinicians’ choices of restorative materials for children.  Aust Dent J. 2003;  48 221-232
• 51 Roeters J J, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk R C. et al . Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results.  Am J Dent. 1998;  11 143-148
• 52 Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C. et al . Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.  Am J Dent. 2001;  14 148-152
• 53 Mortada A, King N M. A simplified technique for the restoration of severely mutilated primary anterior teeth.  J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2004;  28 187-192
• 54 Kupietzky A. Bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: clinical tips for a successful outcome.  Pediatr Dent. 2002;  24 145-148
• 55 Kupietzky A, Waggoner W E, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years.  Pediatr Dent. 2005;  27 221-225
• 56 Waggoner W F. Restoring primary anterior teeth.  Pediatr Dent. 2002;  24 511-516
• 57 Mjor I A, Dahl J E, Moorhead J E. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth.  Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;  60 25-28
• 58 Varpio M, Warfvinge J, Noren J G. Proximo-occlusal composite restorations in primary molars: marginal adaptation, bacterial penetration, and pulpal reactions.  Acta Odontol Scand. 1990;  48 161-167
• 59 Pashley D H, Tay F R, Yiu C. et al . Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging.  J Dent Res. 2004;  83 216-221
• 60 Marks L A, Weerheijm K L, van Amerongen W E. et al . Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation.  Caries Res. 1999;  33 387-392